1.With respect to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant X-friendly Council and against the defendant Y:

order implementation under subsection (1).

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the part of “1. Basic Facts” from 3rd to 5th 20th 20th 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same; and (b) thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Defendant B, S, Q, Q, D, F, C, G, H, M, P, I, J, K, L, and R respectively are the co-defendants of the first instance court with “S, T, Q, Q, D, F, C, H, M, N, P, P, K, K, L, and R”.

The following shall be added between the 11st place and the 12th place:

“Z, the assessment title of each of the above lands, is the same as that of the Plaintiff’s fleet.” The Defendants’ agents stated at the third pleading date of the trial that the assessment title of the land of this case and the identity of the Plaintiff’s fleet are not disputed.

The 4th parallel 5 to 10th parallels shall be followed as follows:

[6] The part of the ship (c) part 575 square meters connected in sequence 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 31, 30, 29, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 28, 28, and 3 of the Suwon-gun AC large 174 square meters (5 square meters) [Attachment 2] was combined with AJ large 167 square meters on August 26, 202, and the land of this case was combined with the part (c) of the ship connected in sequence 52 square meters on August 4, 201.

On June 10, 1971, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of AL, which was put up by Defendant Y on June 10, 1971, with respect to the area of 575 square meters in Suwon-gun AC (Guwon-gun), and on June 2, 1981, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Defendant Y on December 5, 1973, with No. 16839, the receipt of Ansan-gun District Court's Ansan-gun support, which was based on the sale on December 5, 1973.

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant clan of this case (the part on the second land of this case)

A. The holder of a title ownership registration of the relevant legal doctrine regarding the cause of the claim shall be presumed the owner, but the person assessed the relevant land.