beta
Text
Defendant
CK shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months.
However, as to Defendant CK, this is applicable.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants leased a car from a car rental business operator for a short term, and sold it to a third party to raise profits.
1. Around 20:00 on July 3, 2012, Defendant CK concluded a lease contract with a vehicle with the content of a vehicle that is used for usage fee of KRW 800,000,000,000, at the market price owned by CW car owned by CN (the title of the vehicle ownership registration was still remains CN at the time of the instant crime, while the Defendant CN purchased the said vehicle from CN, a title of the registration of ownership of CW car, but the title of the vehicle ownership registration remains CN at the time of the instant crime) from the HW GT car, a vehicle rental company, a vehicle rental company, a vehicle rental company, and victim CN, a vehicle rental company, a vehicle rental company, by the fifth day of the same month, from the 2nd day of the same month.
However, in fact, the Defendants only intended to dispose of the said car to a third party to make profits, and did not intend to return it to the victim after using the said car.
Defendant
CK delivered the said car from the above CP, i.e., the said car, and around that time, delivered the said car to Defendant A.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired in collusion and received the victim’s property by deceiving the CP.
2. On July 3, 2012, Defendant CK concluded a vehicle lease agreement with the content that Defendant CK used CVW 520D car for usage fees of 7.440,000 won for two days from the fifth day of the same month, at the front of the “CT” coffee shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government CTS, the mother of the CU and CU, for the market price of the victim CVW 520D car, equivalent to 63.5 million won.
However, in fact, the Defendants only intended to dispose of the said car to a third party to make profits, and there was no intention to return it to the victim after using the said car.
Defendant
CK delivered the said car from the above CU, that is, the said CU, and around that time, delivered the said car to Defendant A.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with each other.