A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 25, 2019, the Defendant of the Special Intimidation 1633 of the 2019 order issued clothes to the victim D (n, 75 years of age) who is the owner of the above nives, while taking in hand the nives of the nives B C around 07:00 on October 25, 2019, the Defendant of the Special nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nive

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. On October 9, 2019, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force 77 on the top of 2020 senior group: (a) committed an indecent act, committed an indecent act on the part of the victim G (the family name, female, age 22)’s top in the reading room on the fourth floor of F Library 4 located in Yasan-si, Yasan-si, the lower court committed an indecent act by putting the top of the victim G (the family name, age 22) on his/her hand.

Summary of Evidence

[2019 High Court Order 1633] The defendant's oral statement made by witness D / The arrest report on the occurrence of a case in which part of the police interrogation protocol was entered, the report on internal investigation(s) and the photograph of the seized list / [20 High Court Order 77] The defendant's partial statement in court

1. Entry of the statement of the police in the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the accused in part of the protocol concerning the police's statement;

1. He asserts that the Defendant’s act of taking the victim’s humping to the end of the 112 report case, the investigation report (related to interview with investigation) opinion, and the written hospitalization confirmation [in relation to the 2020 senior group 77 case, the defense counsel cannot be deemed as an act that causes sexual humiliation or aversion to the general public or goes against good sexual morality, and thus cannot be deemed as an indecent act that infringes on the victim’s sexual freedom, and the Defendant cannot be deemed as having committed an indecent act. However, in full view of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, it is true that the Defendant humping the part of the victim’s humd, which was the victim’s humb on his book, was humping with the victim’s own hand.