Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the Daejeon Jung-gu E apartment, the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives, the defendant B is the representative of the above apartment, the defendant C is the three representative of the above apartment, the victim F is the representative of the above apartment and the auditor of the council of occupants' representatives, and the victim G is the husband of the above F.

On November 15, 2011, the Defendants found that the current accounting was found and paid a monetary reward of KRW 500,000.00.00.00.00.00.00.. However, the auditors sent to residents, sent a false name to the name that they were found, and the residents were fluenced.0.0.00.0.0.00.00..00..00..00..00..00..00..00..00..00...00..00...000...00..000...000...000.. 1000. 2000. 2006. 2000. 2006. 2006. 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, H, I, and J;

1. Part of each police interrogation protocol (including copies) against the Defendants

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the accused and the defense counsel

1. Defendants and defense counsel’s assertion that they posted the above inducements for the public interest, and all of the above inducements are true. Even if there are some contents related to the family name, there was considerable reason to believe that the Defendants were true.

Therefore, the above acts of the Defendants do not constitute a crime.

2. First of all, the determination is based on the following evidence: (a) whether the above printed matter related to the name document was false; and (b) whether the above printed matter was cited for the first time in relation to the embezzlement of I’s former accounting.