1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s action against the part AG shall be dismissed;

2. The plaintiffs and the plaintiffs (appointed parties).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the parties 1) The Plaintiffs, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), and the Appointors (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”).

The apartment of this case hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case") in the AI and AJ in the area of an urban development project in the Goyang-dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

The apartment complex of this case is divided into three complexes and five complexes, among the apartment buildings in this case, the apartment complex of this case is divided into three complexes and five complexes. The defendant Yangyang Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Yangyang Industrial Development") and the defendant Yangyang Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Yangyang Industrial Development") are three complexes among the apartment of this case, the building of the petition, the construction of the building of the defendant, the development of the large industry, the development of the defendant Yangyang Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant"), and the more accumulated forest of the defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant"), among the apartment of this case, the construction of

B. The Plaintiffs, etc. entered into each of the instant sales contracts and payment of the price thereof 1) as indicated in the “contract date”, “Dongho Lake,” and “sale price” in the attached Table 1 attached hereto, and as to the instant apartment with the Defendants, each of the instant apartment contracts (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

(2) The Plaintiffs, etc. paid the down payment to the Defendants as indicated in the “payment date” and “payment amount” column of the attached Table 2 of the attached Table 2.

3) In addition, the Plaintiffs, etc. paid part payments to the Defendants six times, and the Plaintiffs received a loan from each financial institution, and the Defendants paid interest on the Plaintiffs’ loans to the said financial institution. (c) The Defendants cancelled each of the instant part-time sales contracts. The Defendants sent the occupancy designation period to the Plaintiffs, etc. (hereinafter “the Plaintiffs, etc.”) as indicated in the attached Table 1 Nos. 1, 5 through 8, 13, 14, 16 through 20, 24 through 27, 30 through 43 in around October 31, 2010 to December 31, 2010, but the aforementioned Plaintiffs sent the occupancy designation period to the said Plaintiffs, etc. (hereinafter “the Plaintiffs, etc.”).