A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The seized evidence Nos. 1 through 4 of the original District Prosecutors' Office (No. 669 of the original District Prosecutors' Office).

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant handled the psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related Mesofts (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”), as follows:

1. At around 00:30 on January 27, 2020, the Defendant injected philophones into the water and injected them with approximately 0.03g of philophones in Clet D, the Defendant’s dwelling at the window B of Changwon-si, the Defendant’s dwelling.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered philophones.

2. Around 13:54 on January 28, 2020, the Defendant possession of phiphonephones carried approximately 0.57 g of phiphones in front of the E-building window in the window of Changwon-si by dividing them into three for a single use and one of three for a vinyl.

On April 1, 2016, the Defendant sentenced nine months to imprisonment for violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court on April 1, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Detention Center on July 1, 2016.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a Frocketing car.

On September 15, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:45, and proceeded along the three-lanes of the Ariju-dong, Ariju-dong, Ariju-dong, along the three-lanes of the Briju-dong. The Defendant tried to turn it to the right of way from the surface of the rooftop-dong, to the right of way.

In this case, the defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle along the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had the safety signs installed on the left side of the right side of the right side of the right side before the right side due to the negligence of driving the above car, and caused the above car to be driven over three times on the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim G(60 years of age) who was on the top of the operation of the said car due to the above occupational negligence at the H I Hospital located at the time of 23:37 on the same day.

2...