1. The defendant shall pay 3,544,100 won to the plaintiff and 5% per annum from August 13, 2018 to the day of complete payment.

1. The Plaintiff, in fact, leased each of the buildings in both weeks D (hereinafter referred to as “O buildings of this case”) from the Defendant as follows:

On September 4, 2013, 200, KRW 350,000,000 on September 2, 2016, 2016, the end date of the monthly lease deposit for the object of lease 1 E, the date of the lease, which is the date of the contract, of the object of lease : (a) on June 3, 2016, the Plaintiff returned each of the instant buildings to the Defendant on August 12, 2018, respectively, at the end of the lease : (b) on September 2, 2016, KRW 13,00,300,000 on June 21, 2016, G G G 3, 2014, KRW 5,000,000 on January 9, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 and 5 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The lease agreement concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the claim for the remainder of KRW 3,938,065 regarding each of the instant buildings was finally terminated on August 12, 2018, and the Plaintiff returned each of the instant buildings to the Defendant until then. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 3,54,100 after deducting the total amount of overdue rent and public charges of KRW 18,455,90 from the total amount of KRW 13,000,000, E-dong KRW 13,000,000, KRW 13,000,000, KRW 5,000, KRW 5,000, KRW 13,55,90, KRW 3,54,100, and damages for delay after August 13, 2018.

The plaintiff's remaining claim for the lease deposit is reasonable within the scope of the above recognition.

B. The Plaintiff’s claim for damages of KRW 2,000,000 is assessed against the Defendant for the following reasons.

In other words, when the plaintiff delivers the Edong and Fdong building of this case, the electric temperature panel and other facilities installed in the above building were left under the permission of the defendant to sell to the new lessee.

However, since the defendant arbitrarily removed and damaged the above facilities, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff KRW 2,00,000 equivalent to the value of the above facilities.

2. The plaintiff