logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.09.15 2017고단991
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2017, the Defendant received a proposal that he would withdraw and deliver money from a singishing staff member without his name, and he would make a loan by accumulating the records of bank transactions. The Defendant provided an account under the name of the Defendant to withdraw the money remitted to the account and deliver the money to the account holder with no name.

Accordingly, on January 21, 2017, the Defendant sent a passbook connected to the Defendant’s bank account (D) with the name of the Defendant at around C305 Dong 509 at around 18:00 on January 21, 2017.

On the other hand, on January 18, 2017, an employee in charge of the singing of a name-free person assumes the victim E by telephone at a non-displacement on the victim E, and opens a 30 million won Maspbook.

The credit rating of the party is 30 million won or less, and the credit rating of the party is 20 million won or less, and the credit rating of the party is high, so it is possible to lend 30 million won or more to the bank account under the name of the defendant. Thus, it is false to the purport that it is "transfer to the bank account of the name of the party A, which is the modern card management account, by receiving 20 million won or more from the modern card loan." On January 23, 2017, it was transferred from the victim to the above bank account under the name of the defendant around 13:11, 200 won.

The defendant, even though he knew that the above money was illegally acquired by the winners, tried to withdraw the money from the branch offices of the Korean bank located in the same 51 Doo-ro, the defendant did not withdraw the money with the wind that was discovered to the police officers dispatched upon receipt of a report.

As a result, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media, and made it easier for the Defendant to commit the crime of phishing staff in the name of the above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certificates of deposit transactions;

1. The relevant provisions of Article 49(4)1 and Article 6(3)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts; Articles 347(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act; and each of the imprisonment with labor.

arrow