logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.01.09 2018고정522
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A A The fine of KRW 50,00,000, the fine of KRW 700,000,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, or Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 5, 2017 by imprisonment with prison labor for special injury, etc. at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on September 5, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 23, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 1, 2017, the Defendants’ co-offendered Defendants heard the horses that “I would like to make the tobacco wraped on the platform,” from the victim G (the age of 46) who is an employee of the above party headquarters, while having the party headquarters in the “F Party Design” located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 200 on September 1, 2017, and she saw the horses that “I would like to have the tobacco wraped on the platform, I would like to have the victim wrap and sound the victim who would return to the account.”

Then, Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant C continued sound of the victim to report 112, and Defendant D entered the direction to the direction of the party room to bring the victim out of the calculation unit by getting the victim to the direction of the party room.

After that, Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant D got off the victim to the inside of the calculation unit, and sound the victim, and Defendant A and Defendant C heard the disturbance from the upper floor of the above party room, and Defendant A and Defendant C met the employees I of the “H Game Center”, who talked with the Defendants.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to avoid disturbance about about 20 minutes, thereby allowing customers who were in the above party room to leave the said party room, thereby obstructing the victim's party room business by force.

2. Defendant D’s assault assaulted the victim by taking the two descendants of the above victim G (age 46) who reported 112 during the time and place described in paragraph (1) as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness regarding G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to I;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. CCTV images;

1. Previous convictions: Court rulings and case outputs shall be applied to the Acts and subordinate statutes.

arrow