A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall pay 17,655,000 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On June 201, the Defendant issued two gold 17,65,00 won at the market price (one gold 20,000 won, one KRW 15,000) and three gold macks (one gold 200,000 won, one 30,000 won, one 18,180 KK 20,000 won, and one 18K 20,000 won) to the victim C at a sang area located in the sking of the sang-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, 201, and one gold macks (one gold 20,18K 30,18K 1,18K 20,000 won, respectively) from the victim.

However, even if the defendant received the plaque from the victim, he was thought to sell it to the bank, and there was no intention or ability to return the plaque to the victim or to repay the equivalent amount.

As above, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, and acquired gold stuffs and gold straws, etc. equivalent to KRW 17,655,00 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of investigation report (related to the defendant A and his/her currency-free goods)

1. Two claimed gold bullion are claimed.

2. The victim asserts that he/she borrowed two gold gings and three gold gings to the defendant from the time of filing a complaint, and consistently makes statements from an investigative agency to the court, and thus, the victim has credibility in his/her statement and is also clearly aware of the plaques.

On the other hand, both the Defendant and the victim stated that they would bring about the Defendant’s plaque in order to borrow the degree of 5 million won as security. However, the failure to take as security requires at least 5 million won to borrow the Defendant’s plaque, and it is unclear whether the Defendant transferred the money to the “D” account transfer of KRW 4.5 million on June 30, 201, and it is not clear whether the Defendant actually lent the money to the “D” account transfer of KRW 4.5 million on June 30, 201, and the contact address with the Defendant is not sufficiently verified. Thus, the money that the Defendant sold the plaque is asserted by the Defendant.