logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.02 2015가합4828
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant C shall be dismissed.

2. Defendant B: (a) KRW 16,845,601 on May 9, 2012 to the Plaintiff; and (b)

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a building located D in Sungsung City around September 2011 (hereinafter “instant building”).

(2) Of the second floor, Defendant C is the owner of the instant building, and Defendant B is the owner of the instant building that is directly adjacent to the instant building and is the owner of the instant building E in e (hereinafter “the instant adjacent building”).

B. The parking lot (hereinafter “instant parking lot”) is located in the front section of the building of this case, which connects through the second floor of the building of this case, and the end of the said parking lot is far away from the outer wall of the building of this case.

C. In the narrow space between the end of the main hold of this case and the outer wall of the building adjacent to this case, the buildings extended without permission (including the roof; hereinafter “instant temporary building”) to the neighboring building were installed. However, the Defendant B removed the building upon receiving a corrective order to remove the said building from the Sung-si on April 30, 2012 in the course of performing remodeling works for the building adjacent to this case (hereinafter “instant construction”) and then removed the building upon receiving a corrective order to remove the building from the Sung-si on the said date, and then made a hack pipe support unit for the removal of the building with the height of the building like the parking space (hereinafter “the instant vinyl”).

On May 9, 2012, the Plaintiff’s falling accident, along with the Plaintiff’s children (the age of 4 years at that time) around 21:00, went through the second floor of the building of this case and the parking lot of this case, while the Plaintiff’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

arrow