logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.07.03 2018고정319
건축법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 20, 2015, the Defendant, as an architect, was in charge of the supervision of fishery products in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

A supervisor shall prepare an interim report on supervision if the progress of the project differs from the Jindo prescribed by Presidential Decree, and a report on the completion of supervision if the project is completed, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and the project owner shall submit it to the competent permitting authority.

On January 22, 2016, the Defendant submitted an interim supervision report on November 13, 2015, to an employee at the jurisdiction of the Dong-gu, Yandong-gu, Yannam-si, on behalf of the owner on December 22, 2015, and a self supervision completion report on December 22, 2015.

On October 2, 2015, this supervision completion report was accompanied by a certificate of quality assurance and fireproof structure, stating that the seal was properly carried out three times, and that the thickness of the final inspection seal was confirmed to meet the standard value (0.8m).

However, the above-mentioned painting work has been carried out two times, and the facts charged are stated as follows: “The painting work has been carried out two times using a general paint, not a fireproof paint.”

However, the submitted evidence alone proves that a general paint, not a fireproof paint, has been used.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, to the extent that it does not infringe on the defendant's right of defense, the part "using a general paint other than a fireproof paint" is deleted and recognized.

The clothes thickness (0.249 - 0.376 m) was less than the standard value, and the certificate of quality of the body list and fireproof structure at the above site was the site manager without directly checking the site at the time of painting construction.

D's draft drawn up falsely was received through the trial work and the defendant affixed his signature and seal.

Accordingly, the defendant is an intermediate report on supervision.

arrow