logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.04.05 2012고단2518
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a FM7 car, Defendant B is a vehicle of GM5 car, Defendant C is a person engaged in driving a HNF rocketing car.

Defendant

A, around 17:50 on May 12, 2012, while under the influence of alcohol with 0.105% of blood alcohol content, A driven the said SM7-car and proceeded to the roads in front of the (e.g., the (e., the) sewage room in the Chang-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and Defendant B, and C had the same place run toward the Orsa Science Complex from the side of the Cheongju Airport.

The location was an access road that enters the main line from Tolpt to the main line, and the speed limit was 80km per hour, and in the case of Defendant A, it was a situation where Defendant A entered the main lane from Tolpt connection.

In such a case, Defendant A, who is engaged in driving service, had a duty of care to perform duties of care to enter the lane in order to keep the rear side and the right and the right and the right and the right are well examined, and Defendant B and C had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by observing the speed of restriction and by properly examining the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle and other vehicles entering the lane.

Nevertheless, Defendant A neglected this and entered a three-lanes from the end of the connection, and later, Defendant A was negligent in changing the lane rapidly into the two-lanes, and Defendant B, who was proceeding with the two-lanes at a speed of 118km above 38km, was rapidly changed to the one-lane in order to avoid this, and thereby, Defendant C, who proceeded with one-lanes at a speed of 118km above 38km and speed of 118km, led Defendant C to the first shock of Defendant B’s SM5 car in the process of avoiding that speed. Defendant C’s NF or other car, which led to the said shock, led to the said shock.

As a result, Defendant C driving.

arrow