1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for this Court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the following provisions are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court makes a decision on the addition of the plaintiffs’ assertion in this Court, and thus, they shall be quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the

[Supplementary or additional parts] Section 1-A(2) of the first instance judgment (hereinafter this part is omitted) (hereinafter referred to as “201.8.10” shall be deemed as “ August 18, 2016.” and paragraph 3) shall be added as follows:

3 The judgment of September 13, 2016 became final and conclusive on September 13, 2016, because both the defendant and D did not appeal against the above appellate judgment.

(4) Following the first instance court's decision (4) 6. (5) : (5) : (4) : (1) ; (2) ; (3) ; (4) ; (4) ; (3) ; (4) ; (4) ; (4) ; (4) ; (4) ; (5) ; (4) ; (5) ; (4) ; (5) ; (4) ; (5) ; and (5)

2. Determination on the Plaintiffs’ additional assertion

A. If “a judgment” under the instant agreement refers to the principal and interest of the judgment, the claim subject to agreement can be divided into “the amount remaining as of February 27, 2017 as the judgment amount for related civil litigation” and “the principal and interest of the judgment amount” as of February 27, 2017 as of February 27, 2017.

By January 13, 2017, the Defendant collected the sum of KRW 68,906,245 from D and appropriated it for repayment. Of the judgment remaindering as of February 27, 2017, the original obligation was extinguished.

Therefore, the remaining debts of the plaintiffs from January 14, 2017 to the same year.

2. The damages for delay until the 27.27.2,601,615 won is the Seoul Central District Court, and the defendant's judgment against the plaintiffs.