logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.02 2015고단2569
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 24, 2014, the Defendant took part in a permanent joint and several rally held by the “candlelight of the people to return without delay from the missing in the Sewol ferry and to recover the culture of the victims,” which was held by the “candlelight of the people to return without delay from the missing in the Sewol ferry and recover the culture of the victims,” which was held by the “candle of the people to return without delay from the missing in the Sewol ferry and recover the culture of the victims,” on the south side of the Cheongcheon-ro, Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul.

At around 20:35 on the same day, there are about 1,00 participants in other assemblies, returning to the blind distance in the scopical station, and from around 22:13, it was cultivated by attempting to enter the scopic zone, moving out the scopic zone, moving out the scopic zone, or moving out the scopic zone.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Shot photographs of each dystropios and caps of dynamic images;

1. The assembly report (the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court can be acknowledged that the participants, including the defendant, occupy an exclusive lane prior to the road and make it impossible or considerably difficult for the defendant to communicate traffic for a considerable period of time. In addition, in light of the status of the defendant, the attitude of occupation and occupation, and the occupation time of occupation, etc., it is reasonable to deem that the defendant had the intention to interfere with general traffic. Furthermore, since the means or method of the act is not sufficient, it cannot be deemed that the defendant exceeded the legitimate scope of exercise of fundamental rights, it does not constitute an act that does not go against political parties or social rules).

1. Article 185 of the Criminal Act and Article 185 of the same Act concerning the crime;

1. Detention at a workhouse;

arrow