Defendant

A and C shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,00,00,000, Defendant B, D, and E by each fine of KRW 2,00,000.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 D 피고인은 2011. 8. 일자불상경 안양시 만안구 H에 있는 주식회사 I 사무실에서, 업무용 컴퓨터에 피해자 매스웍스 인코퍼레이티드가 저작권을 가지고 있는 MatLab 프로그램을 무단으로 복제하는 방법으로 저작권을 침해하였다.

2. 피고인 E 피고인은 2011. 9. 일자불상경 위 주식회사 I 사무실에서, 개인용 노트북에 피해자 매스웍스 인코퍼레이티드가 저작권을 가지고 있는 MatLab 프로그램을 무단으로 복제하는 방법으로 저작권을 침해하였다.

3. On March 2012, Defendant B infringed on the copyright by reproducing the ADS program copyright owned by the victim ADS C&C’s copyright to his computer for business purposes without permission at the above I Office of Police Officer.

4. On September 11, 2012, Defendant A infringed on the copyright by reproducing the victim’s ADS program without permission at the said I Office of the said I Office of the Defendant, by reproducing the victim’s ADS program with a copyright on the computer for business purposes.

5. On September 11, 2012, Defendant C infringed on the copyright by reproducing the victim’s ADS program without permission at the said I Office of the said I Office of the Defendant, by reproducing the victim’s ADS program with a copyright on the computer for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the statute of the additionally filed complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts D and E: Article 136(1)2, A, and C of the Copyright Act (Amended by Act No. 11110, Dec. 2, 2011); Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act

1. Optional fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel's assertion of defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order does not constitute a crime because the defendants' act constitutes a reproduction for private use.