The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant shows the attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime, and that the defendant has agreed with the victim of the crime of larceny and damage to property when it comes to the trial, the defendant has been punished for violent crimes. In particular, the defendant is not aware of the fact that he/she has been under suspension of execution due to the crime of special injury to the period of repeated crime due to the crime of causing damage to special property, and that he/she has repeated the crime using dangerous articles, and that he/she has not agreed with the victims of special injury, etc., he/she still has no agreement with the victims of the crime of special injury, and other circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, criminal record, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair merely because

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.