The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (4 months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant made a judgment favorable to the sentencing is the fact that all of the facts charged in the instant case were led to the trial, and that the Defendant made a confession and reflect on all of the facts charged, and that the Defendant made an agreement with

However, the special assault of this case may cause serious consequences, such as injury to a victim, the defendant had been punished several times due to the same crime, such as the crime of property damage and the crime of bodily injury, and each of the crimes of this case has been committed under the suspension period due to the crime of property damage, and the motive, circumstances, means and results of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, and all other factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments are considered in full view of the aforementioned favorable circumstances, even if considering the favorable circumstances as seen above, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. According to the conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendant’s appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (On the other hand, the Defendant asserted to the effect that there was no commencement of the commission of the crime of property damage since he merely saw the above decline at the time of the instant case to the victim.

However, the above argument is not subject to the judgment of this court as a subsequent argument for the period for submitting the appeal with the reason for appeal, and it is not subject to the judgment of this court, and even after ex officio examination, the following circumstances that the court below legally adopted and investigated and recognized by the court below, namely, the defendant extracted hacks who had been sticked in the dry field beyond the victim's house at bar, and downloads the victim's dog to the opening, and the defendant hacks the hacks of the decision of the court below in which the defendant intends to take back the victim's dog, and the victim hacks the hack

"Flapsing, running, and passing away," and the defendant is the defendant.