1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the representative of the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The 11-year-old damage of KRC M 1) L, Inc. 1, L, Inc. 11-year-old damage, L, H, P, and Q.O had R and S. However, as L and S were entered into the two-year-old damage of NA, CR’s subsequent descendants and S among the O’s subsequent descendants became different in the world. 2) T were the 6-year-old damage of SH (U is the 9-year-old damage V (K’s damage) and U’s subsequent descendants were adopted to W who are subsequent descendants of KR.

T had ASEAN, X, Y, and Z, but X/Y did not have their own descendants, and only Z was owned by them, and both their descendants belong to AA.

3) The Defendants’ preference AB made AC and AD with Z descendants. AC transferred both before AB’s birth to AB’s model AE, and thereafter AB adopted AD with ASEAN’s children. 4) AC had AG composed of ASEAN, and AH is the south of AG.

5) An AI, the south of AD, had AJ, AK, AL, AM, NM, and Defendant E. AK had children, and AJ had Defendant F, G, H, and I with children. (B) The Defendants’ transfer of ownership of the instant land was registered as the owner of the instant land.

2) On December 30, 1978, AH made the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership Transfer (Act No. 3094, invalidation, and invalidation; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”).

(3) AK, AL, AM, and NN (hereinafter “AK, etc.”) filed a lawsuit against AH against the Defendants other than Defendant B, C, and D for the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land due to the restoration of authentic names. “AK, etc. recognized that CB had received the assessment of the instant land during the Japanese occupation period, and that registration of ownership preservation completed by AH pursuant to the Act on Special Measures was broken in light of various circumstances.”