As to each of the crimes against Defendant 2012 Highest 1900, 2012 Highest 2697, 2012 Highest 436, 2013 Highest 673, 2013 Highest 2259.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 26, 2010, the Daejeon High Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), which became final and conclusive on April 28, 201 (the first sentence). On December 16, 2011, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of six months for fraud, etc. on December 24, 201, which became final and conclusive on December 24, 201 (the second sentence), and on May 10, 2012, the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 24, 201, after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a criminal offense from the Daejeon District Court to a suspended sentence of four months for a period of imprisonment on January 24, 2013.

(Article 3). [Attachment 2012 Highest 1900]

1. Crimes against victims E;

A. On December 15, 2008, the Defendant, in the “G photographic Book,” located in the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, stated that “The Defendant was punished by a lot of money for the resale of real estate at home,” and there was no risk at all. Dr. Dr. Dr., the amount of the resale would be divided by half and half, and the profits would be divided. One of the damages would be hymar, hymar, which would preserve the principal at home. One of them must be urgent for the remainder of one month. In order to resell, the Defendant would be able to receive a profit of KRW 300-4 million per month, because it would be able to receive a profit of KRW 27 million if invested in the amount of KRW 30 million.”

However, in fact, the defendant needs money to pay for expenses incurred in operating the office at the time of the operation of the office and to make a false statement to the victim, and made a false investment in resale.

Even if the victim did not have the intent or ability to preserve the principal of the victim.

On December 18, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 27 million won from the victim with a new bank account (number H) in the name of the Defendant on December 18, 2008 as the real estate resale price.

B. On December 19, 2008, the Defendant had a simple real estate resale in which profit can be recovered if the Defendant called “the victim by telephone.”

It is trying to make a resale investment.