A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 16:20 on July 16, 2014, the Defendant thought that at around 86, 2014, the Defendant was a public official of the office of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, a public official who was called up for the control of the violation of parking and stopping regulations at the location of the vehicle for delivery B, and that C, a public official of the office of Gwanak-gu, who was called up for the control of the violation of parking and stopping regulations at the location of the report, and that C, a public official of the office of Gwanak-gu, who was on board of the above public official, took back the back part of the E-Poter cargo loaded by the above public official as the front part of the vehicle for delivery for the Defendant’s operation, and that C, who was on the vehicle, continued to walk up the above 5-day cargo to the victim (58 years old) for 10 days, 50 days in total, 50 days in total, and 50 days in total, in which the above public official was on board.

Accordingly, the defendant, by assault, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by public officials, and at the same time, injured the victim, and damaged the objects used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement about D and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning an injury diagnosis certificate, photographs of damaged vehicles, and estimates;

1. Article 136 (1), Article 257 (1) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act of the corresponding statutory provisions concerning criminal facts (the point of causing bodily harm), which are applicable to the crimes (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that there is no history of punishment, considerable amount of money to the injured victim, and the fact that confession and reflects are paid, in addition to a fine once).