A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 13, 2014, at around 12:05, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance by means of any cresh in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and intruded inside a sexual party; (b) damaged the lock locking system of the two Huntings by using the cresh inside the cresh; and (c) destroyed the locking system of the two Huntings by using the mos in the mos of the said gender; and (d) stolen the money equivalent to KRW 300,000,000 owned by the victim DNA.

2. The Defendant intruded into a structure managed by a DNA party for the purpose of theft of another’s property at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of occurrence and crime;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture [the scope of recommending punishment] 4 types of theft in general property [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation] residential crimes, and intrusion into places other than indoor residential spaces (the decision of sentence four types] / although there has been a history of punishment for the same kind of crime (the decision of sentence], the defendant is against his mistake, the defendant seems to have committed a crime while suffering from economic difficulties by growing up in the poor home environment, the fact that there is no significant damage caused by the crime, the fact that the defendant's age, character and conduct, the background of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, shall be determined as the order.