logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고정3778
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2011, the Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information for which the judgment became final and conclusive on July 28, 2011, after having been sentenced to five years of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes in Busan District Court.

Where personal information submitted pursuant to Article 43 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes is changed, a person subject to registration of personal information shall submit the reason and details of the change to the head of a police agency having jurisdiction over his/her domicile within 20

The Defendant was released from a port prison on February 19, 2016 and the actual place of residence was changed, but the Defendant did not submit the reasons and details of the change to the chief of the police station having jurisdiction over the domicile within 20 days from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (as to attachment of a copy of the judgment):

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 50 (3) 2 and Article 43 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on December 9, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to ten months from the Busan District Court to imprisonment for quasi-indecent act by compulsion, and the Busan District Court is pending in the trial of the appellate court. We consider equity in the case where the defendant was sentenced to a first instance judgment at the same time as the facts constituting the above appellate court

arrow