logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1991. 5. 10. 선고 91다8067 판결
[손해배상(자)][공1991.7.1,(899),1614]
Main Issues

The case holding that the court below's measures taken by the court below on the basis of the average wage of the male workers of an industrial enterprise with less than one year's experience graduated from a university in light of a report on the status quo of wages by occupation, which completed military service and completed four years of the victim's actual income during the university are justifiable

Summary of Judgment

The case holding that the court below's measures taken by the court below on the basis of the average wage of male workers employed by industrial enterprises with less than one year experience who graduated from universities in light of a report on the actual status of wages by job classification, which completed military service and completed four years of the victim's actual income during the university, are justifiable.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 763 and 393 of the Civil Act

Reference Cases

[Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Han, Attorneys Park Dong-young et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellant-appellee)

Plaintiff-Appellee

Maximum number of persons other than 6 others

Defendant-Appellant

Korea

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 90Na3752 delivered on January 25, 1991

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

In calculating the lost income of the deceased, the court below recognized that the above deceased was scheduled to complete military service at the time of the accident ( October 1, 1989) and to graduate on February 20, 1990 as a student attending the fourth year from the law school of Gyeyang-gu University, barring any special circumstance if the accident of this case occurred, he would be employed from the university after graduating from the university, and would have earned a profit by being employed as an industrial employee, barring any special circumstance. The court below calculated the lost income of the above deceased's male worker who had a career of less than one year who graduated from the university in accordance with the report on the survey of wage status of the job classification, on the basis of this, since the monthly salary of the male worker who had a career of less than 1

According to the records, the above recognition and judgment of the court below are just and they cannot be viewed as special damage to the deceased's actual import loss. The arguments are without merit.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Lee Woo-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow