logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.11.02 2015고단3409
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. at the District Court of Jung-gu District on February 19, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the medical prison.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 2015, the Defendant stolen the victim’s resident registration certificate from the victim’s wall while working in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, where he had been employed as an employee.

2. At around 10:00 on June 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) presented a stolen D’s resident registration certificate as if the Defendant’s resident registration certificate was the Defendant’s resident registration certificate; and (b) presented it to the Defendant’s public document at “H” mobile phone store located in “H” mobile phone store located in “H” city F; and (c) presented it as if he were the Defendant’s resident registration certificate

3. Forgery of private documents, uttering of falsified investigation documents, and fraud;

A. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, entered “D” in the column for the purchase of a mobile phone stored therein without authority for the purpose of exercising the mobile phone subscription at the same time and place as in the same as in the preceding paragraph, and signed it by side to the name of the applicant, stating “D” in the applicant column, and sign it by side.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a mobile phone subscription application in the name of D, which is a private document on the rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, issued one copy of the forged mobile phone subscription application to G who is aware of the fact as above, and exercised it as if it were duly formed.

C. At the same time and place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant issued the victim G a forged mobile phone application and sent the victim G an attitude to pay the mobile phone installments or the fee even if the mobile phone was purchased while driving as D.

However, in fact, the defendant uses the stolen D's resident registration certificate as above and belongs to his status.

arrow