logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고단688
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for six months, and for four months, for Defendant C, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A from August 22, 2014 to August 30, 2016, the transportation administration and traffic control group located in G in Seoul as a social service personnel in charge of administrative assistance, such as traffic congestion, and Defendant B served as a social service personnel in charge of administrative assistance, such as vehicle identification, etc. from August 22, 2014 to September 28, 2016. Defendant B served as a social service personnel in charge of administrative assistance, such as the issuance of a motor vehicle registration ledger and a vehicle registration certificate, a temporary number entry plate, etc. at the transportation administration and the motor vehicle service center of the said HH office from August 22, 2014 to September 25, 2016. Defendant C served as a social service personnel in charge of administrative assistance, such as a motor vehicle registration ledger and a vehicle registration certificate, and a seal and replacement of a motor vehicle registration number plate, etc. at the said H office transportation administration and the public service center of the relevant motor vehicle from around June 26, 2015 to September 25.

1. Defendant A and B provided Defendant B with the vehicle owner’s personal information, etc. located in the vehicle information system at the 2nd floor of the H’s second floor around the beginning of July 2016 and the middle end of the year, and Defendant B consented thereto. Defendant B consented thereto.

Defendant

A around 16:30 on July 19, 2016, around 16:16:30, after receiving the residents' number from the J (one name K) representative of the Gyeongnam Branch, and being requested to inquire about the above L, and then transmitting the above L to the Defendant B through the Mesenger. Defendant B inquired about the above L-owned vehicle through the transportation administration and the vehicle management information system of H, and then retransmitting the said information (such as vehicle type, vehicle number, L address, etc.) to the Defendant through the Mesenger, and Defendant A provided the above L-related personal information as shown in the attached Table No. 1.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to divulge another person’s personal information without legitimate authority or beyond permitted authority.

2...

arrow