Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 02:00 on September 8, 2019, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with C, the wife of the above case, and received 112 report on the instant case, and sent D, etc. to the police officer of the Gando Police Station; and (b) the Defendant attempted to go to go to the above C while listening to the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant sent D’s sound to the effect that “I want to go to go to the Republic of Korea, why I want to go to go to go to it”; and (c) sealed the chest part of the above D’s chest, and took the body back one time to go to drinking.”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to 112 reporting.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. 112 reported case handling table;
1. Each photograph;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;
1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;
2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the obstruction of performance of official duties/non-performance of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations], the basic area of recommendation [the scope of recommendation areas and recommendations], six months to one year and six months.
3. The sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, the degree of assault against police officers, the time of and reflect on the crime, the fact that there is no record of the same crime, the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, shall be determined as per the order.