(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.02.14 2018가합204385

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.02.14 2018가합204385

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs, Ga.

In each of the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list, it shall be indicated in the attached Form 2 drawings, 11, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs purchased 1/4 shares of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) through a sales contract dated May 21, 2015 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 19, 2015.

B. The Defendant occupied the instant real estate before the Plaintiffs acquired the ownership of the instant real estate, and owned a vinyl house or a provisional building (hereinafter “the instant facilities”) as described in paragraph (1) above on the ground.

C. On June 18, 2015, the Plaintiffs, among the instant real property, leased to the Defendant by setting the lease term from October 5, 2015 to October 5, 2017, with the rent of KRW 6 million per annum from October 5, 2015, and the instant lease contract.

Unlike the entry of the instant lease agreement, the lessor of the said contract appears to have no dispute between the parties.

The terms and conditions of the instant lease agreement are as follows.

Matters of special agreement

1. The use of this real estate shall be limited to farmers;

2. If the lease term expires, the lessee shall remove and restore the above real estate facilities to its original state and return them to the landowner.

3. That the rent of the real estate at issue complies with the promise that the lessee remove the facilities on the land at issue after the termination of the lease of the land.

4. The rent from October 5, 2014 to October 4, 2015 shall be paid to the lessor.

D. The Defendant owned and used the instant facilities in the instant real estate, but did not pay rent under the instant lease agreement to the Plaintiffs.

E. The Plaintiffs expressed their intent to terminate the instant lease agreement by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint, and the said declaration of intent reached the Defendant on July 2, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including paper numbers).

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2020.10.07 2018가합104218

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.11.22 2018가합456

-울산지방법원 2015.08.21 2015가단3425

-대전지방법원 2016.05.24 2015나108848

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정1669