The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On September 28, 2014, around 04:00 on September 28, 2014, the Defendant, who committed the crime against the victim C (the age of 27), threatened the victim by taking an attitude that the victim would have been at the time of facing the victim, stating that he would be able to cover in the body of the victim, she would be able to cut off, she would cut, and die.

B. On September 28, 2014, around 10:20 on September 28, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E (the age of 34) showed the victim’s attitude that he would inflict any harm on the victim’s lives, such as the victim’s friend that all friend friend friends would die, etc., while considering the victim’s view that he would inflict any harm on the victim’s friende of the above C, which is the victim’s friende of the victim, and the victim’s friend, she threatened the victim by taking a bath while being brithed and insulting.

2. Determination: (a) Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act; (b) an insult is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act; (c) the victim’s written withdrawal of the complaint was submitted to the court on November 7, 2014, which is subsequent to the instant indictment; and (d) the victim C expressed his/her intent not to be punished against the Defendant by attending the court as a witness on June 11, 2015, and thus, the prosecution in the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 and 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.