logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.10 2016고정1932
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the borrower of the D vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and the victim C is the proxy engineer driving the vehicle.

On August 30, 2016, around 00:05, the Defendant filed a non-contentious dispute with the victim and the proxy engineer on the roads in front of the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, about two weeks' face, and concealed the victim's face on several occasions, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the typrypted typ, the impairment of the dystypity of the following arms, the impairment of the dyspium, and the tension of the following arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Each description of a diagnosis of injury, a written confirmation of hospitalization, and a criminal investigation report (Attachment to the details of the victim's currency);

1. Application of statutes on images of on-site photographs;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 32 (1) 3 and Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for compensation is unclear and it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation);

1. Determination on the assertion, etc. by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. In addition, the defendant and his defense counsel denied the facts charged and asserts that the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act under Article 20 of the Criminal Act on the premise of the following facts as to the course of the case and the defendant'

From the Yong-dong in Gwangju Northern-gu to the defendant, the victim is driving the instant vehicle on behalf of the defendant, and the vehicle passes through a mountain intersection in the Nam-gu in Gwangju-gu.

The U.S. stopped after making a U.S. internship from the private distance of the sexual elementary school.

The defendant tried to pay the agency fee in the vicinity of the monthly intersection.

arrow