logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단4029
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special public duties and the Defendant injured the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the “E” restaurant of the D operation in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) obstructed drinking alcohol with F with F; and (c) obstructed F with F with a large voice; and (d) obstructed the Defendant’s demand for returning from the victim H (55 years old) who is the circumstances surrounding the G District in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu Police Station in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, who was called upon 112 after receiving the 112 report; and (b) threatened the victim by assaulting the victim, such as debrising his chest part of his chest and fage, twice, and harming the victim’s other parts necessary for treatment for about two weeks; and (c) threatening the victim by threatening the victim with a dangerous object that was kept on the test.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the victim H 112 who is a police official, and inflicted injury on the victim.

2. In around 18:00 on July 7, 2017, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) at the G District Office in the Gwangju Seo-gu Police Station G District Office located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant: (b) was arrested and transferred in the act of interference with the performance of official duties by the security guards H; (c) while he was sitting in the waiting room with the locking of the lock, she was frighted, and frighted with the locking of the lock so that the 4th unit of the bamboo wave, she was frighted so that the Defendant would remove the locking so that approximately KRW 275,000 of the repair cost would be damaged.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry of the second written protocol concerning the examination of the suspect into the prosecution against the accused;

1. Each statement made by the police with respect to H, D, and F;

1. Each description of a written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of each video statute to victims, on-site photographs, and CDs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, each of the options to commit a crime;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;

arrow