1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On May 19, 2015, the Jeju Regional Procurement Service, under the Defendant’s control, made a public announcement of the “production of government-funded materials for the removal of the space for construction works”, “production of government-funded materials”, “production of government-funded materials for the removal of the space for construction works”, and “a procuring entity”: C, a procuring entity, and “A,” a procuring entity. (2) On June 17, 2015, the Plaintiff was selected as a successful bidder according to the public announcement of the purchase bid. On June 17, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a commodity contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”).

After that, the delivery deadline was extended by March 31, 2016, and was extended by June 28, 2016, and finally extended by August 2, 2016.

Contract name: Item for the purchase and installation of government-funded materials: Contract price for an automatic malodor-dilution device (one unit): 364,800,000 won: The supply period: January 13, 2016; the place of delivery: the delivery conditions for the designated place of delivery by the end-user institution: On-site map.

B. Process 1) The Plaintiff is in the process of executing the instant contract in order to connect the parts of the spatial sloping equipment to the scope of the construction project under the instant contract (hereinafter “consolidated”).

(B) Shein the part of the air exhauster prior to the air exhauster and the part of the air exhauster subsequent to the air exhauster with the air exhauster, which is included but linked to the spatial decipation equipment and the external air exhauster (hereinafter referred to as “cipher”).

(B) The issue of the scope of construction is not included, and the issue of the scope of construction should be determined by the court under the following preceding lawsuit, and the liability supervision chain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) for four times as described below.

A request was made to conduct a factory inspection on the production and installation of government-funded materials.

On July 1, 2016, 2016, the content of D’s reply as of the date of the temporary scheduled inspection was added to pure virtue inspection on July 7, 2016, and submitted a test report after conducting the Plaintiff’s self-inspection. On July 7, 2016, the Plaintiff excluded the pure virtue-related inspection on July 11, 2016.