1. The Seoul Central District Court on April 30, 2019 against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) of the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) prior to the 2019 tea 23686.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a stock company that operates marriage counseling and information provision business, and the defendant is a person who entered into a marriage brokerage contract in its name.

B. On September 15, 2018, the Defendant’s mother indicated that he is the Defendant’s agent in the name of the Defendant, and entered into a marriage brokerage contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Plaintiff at a rate of KRW 6.6 million, which includes the membership fee between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as follows (hereinafter “A”), and paid KRW 6.6 million with the Defendant’s credit card.

2. The service period shall be as follows:

Fixed-term System: B will provide Party A with remaining services without limitation on the frequency of this performance for a period of three months (from September 15, 2018 to December 14, 2018).

(Period of Refundable)

3. Membership fees upon termination of a contract shall be refunded in accordance with the criteria for the settlement of consumer disputes.

The criteria for cancellation of contract and refund at the time of termination due to reasons attributable to the business operator (B).

1. Where a contract for membership is terminated before the company commences the passage of the company arranged after the contract for membership: 20% of the expenses for membership;

2. Where a contract is terminated after the lapse of one time: (Period system) member registration fee 】 (the remaining number of days/total number of days) member registration fee 20%.

6. Refunding money after not holding twice the number of the agreed terms and conditions of the agreement; and

C. In contact with D on November 2018, the Plaintiff introduced the other party and promised to introduce the other party on the day, but on the part of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was revoked on two occasions immediately before the remainder due to the Defendant’s circumstances, and the Plaintiff and D agreed to proceed with the remainder once.

Since then, the defendant was introduced by the plaintiff on January 5, 2019 and February 3, 2019.

On April 19, 2019, the Defendant requested a meeting to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff received an order from the other party who does not meet the grade that the Defendant joined.

In addition, the defendant on April 25, 2019.