1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff falling under the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 10, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a marriage brokerage contract with the Defendant, who is a marriage information company, under which the Defendant would arrange for a marriage with a marriage counterpart (hereinafter “title services”) meeting the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant contract”) and paid KRW 8,00,000 to the Defendant at the expense of joining the said day.

Membership Fees: 8,000,000 won, and sexual divorce honorariums: 3,00,000,000 won (from November 10, 2015 to November 9, 2016) for a period of 12 months, each term service is provided five times in total (special matters: Additional terms for service, and the criteria for cancellation and refund at the time of termination due to a cause attributable to a business operator (defendant) (the defendant).

1. Where a contract for membership is terminated before the company commences the passage of the company arranged after the contract for membership: 20% of the expenses for membership;

2. Standard for cancellation of a contract and for refund at the time of termination due to reasons not attributable to a business operator (defendant) who has been not responsible for the member's membership, where it has been terminated after the lapse of one time 】 (the number of remaining members/total number).

1. Where a contract for membership is terminated before the company commences her full-time marriage arranged after the contract for membership: 80% of the expenses for membership;

2. Where a contract is terminated after the lapse of one time, 80% of the membership fee 】 (number/total frequency) 】 (number of remaining/total frequency) membership fee when termination of a contract shall be refunded pursuant to the Consumer Dispute Resolution Standards and Fair Trade Commission Notice, and other matters not prescribed in the contract of this case shall be based on the "domestic standard terms and conditions of marriage brokerage

B. At the time of concluding the instant contract, the Plaintiff designated the following conditions as desired for each title service, and first selected the items in the order of occupation, family environment (economic power), academic background, and age.

preferred occupation: Lawyer’s preference, age of financial challenge: 1 to 6 years of age: religion of at least 175 cm: The area of challenge against Modern: Exclusion from Daegu.

C. According to the instant contract, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with a title service ten times in total between November 14, 2015 and February 9, 2016. Among them, men introduced on December 12, 2015 and men introduced on December 12, 2015.