beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On May 22, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the Seoul Western District Court on October 10th of the same month and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 30th of the same month.
【Criminal Facts】
Defendants are between them, and the victim F is the case of Defendant A.
In the process that Defendant A received 69 million won from Han Bank in the name of Defendant B, the Defendants forged a false real estate lease agreement with the purport that Defendant B shall lease 80 million won to a house owned by the victim in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that Defendant B would use 56 million won as a security.
1. On November 1, 2009, the Defendants forged private documents by having J, a real estate broker, at the real estate office located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “I”, the real estate office located in Yongsan-gu, Seoul, using a stampial pen, to the location of the real estate in the real estate area by using a tampial pen, “Seoul Gangseo-gu G”, “80,000,000,000” in the deposit column, “F” in the receipt column, “ address: from November 17, 2009 to November 17, 2011” in the lessor column, “ Address: G, resident registration number, K, telephone: L, name:F”, respectively, Defendant A imprinted the seal of new F at his own discretion on each name of the F, and Defendant B stated “the address of Yongsan-gu: 104 Dong-dong,07, N, resident registration number, and name and seal of Defendant B” in Yongsan-gu.
Accordingly, the Defendants forged one copy of the real estate lease contract in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations in collusion.
2. The Defendants in the event of a falsified real estate lease agreement was concluded when they conspired to borrow 56 million won from an employee who is not aware of the forgery at the same time and at the same place.