1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,643,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from November 14, 2015 to December 6, 2016, and the next day.

Basic Facts

The Defendant collected stone at the place of work in Chungcheong-gun C (hereinafter “instant site”), and managed the blasting work, etc. at the instant site via D directors, who are affiliated officers.

The Plaintiff is a person who operates heavy equipment in the trade name of “E”, and around June 2014, the Plaintiff was engaged in collecting stone using a heavy equipment that he/she operates at the instant site.

When collecting building stones at the instant site, the Plaintiff received “construction machine lease contract and work confirmation” from F who managed the instant site under the direction and supervision of D.

The above “construction machinery lease contract and work confirmation” are written respectively as lessor’s “G”, lessee’s disturbance, and prime contractor’s “H”.

The plaintiff's work date and work hours stated in the above "Construction Machinery Lease Contract and Work Certificate" are as shown in the attached Form, and the RoBEX380L type is listed in the "R380C" (attached Form hereinafter referred to as "R380") shall be divided into KRW 400,000 in daily remuneration, and the RoBEX300C in form (attached Form hereinafter referred to as "R300") shall be divided into KRW 350,000 in daily remuneration.

The loan fee of 12,150,000 won is a total of 12,150,000 won for the same period of time as R300 won when it is charged to the number of working days listed in the attached Table.

In addition, the costs of transporting the above construction equipment to the site of this case were set at KRW 600,000 in the case of R380, and KRW 500,000 in the case of R300.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, the defendant's judgment as to the claim of Gap's evidence Nos. 9, 10, 11 (including each number), witness D, I's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings was ordered to J to take a contract for the work of collecting stone at the site of this case, and the above J or I borrowed equipment from the plaintiff after the above J subcontracted to I.