logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.02 2016고단2936
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the contractor of the multi-user housing construction work in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant B was employed by the defendant A and was in charge of the overall management of the above construction site, and the victim D(60 years of age) was engaged in the transportation of building stones at the above site.

around 11:20 on October 5, 2015, Defendants were engaged in the work of attaching stone to the outer wall of the building at the construction site.

The work of attaching building stones on the outer wall of a building is conducted in the process of transporting building stones to the vicinity of the attachment site, the process of delivering transported building stones to the technical technician (a person assisting the technical technician) and the process of attaching the transported building stones to the wall. In particular, the process of delivering the transported building stones to the technical technician is conducted in the work plate installed inside the outer part of the building, and the weight of the building reaches 20 kilograms. As the weight of the building exceeds 20 kilograms, in the process of delivering it, the business operator has a duty of care to pay safety caps to workers and wear them. In the process of delivering it, the business operator has a duty of care to install safety fences, fences, vertical fall-off nets or covers, etc., or to install a safety observation network, etc., and the on-site director has a duty of care to supervise workers to work while wearing safety caps.

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not take such safety measures, and Defendant B did not confirm the fact that the victim did not wear a safety cap but did not cause the victim to wear a safety cap on the second floor of 4 meters and did not cause the victim to wear a safety cap. While the victim delivered building stones (standard 600m x 900m) to E with the technical recognition of the second floor of 4 meters, Defendant A did not take such safety measures as above, Defendant B was treated with injury, such as low oxygen cerebral brain damage and scarf, etc. due to the damage of stone at the center and fall into the ground, and was treated on January 29, 2016.

arrow