logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.6.21. 선고 2012누33753 판결
정보비공개처분취소
Cases

2012Nu33753 Revocation of a disposition not to disclose information

Appellant Saryary appellant

Economic Reform Society

Defendant Appellants and Appellants

Chairman General

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap10451 Decided September 28, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 21, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

June 21, 2013

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's rejection disposition against the disclosure of information as stated in attached Form 1 against the plaintiff on January 27, 2012 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

A. The plaintiff

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff as to paragraph (3) of attached Table 1 shall be revoked.

The defendant's rejection disposition against the disclosure of information as stated in Section 1-C (C) of the Information on Disclosure Claim No. 1 that the plaintiff made on January 27, 2012 shall be revoked.

B. Defendant

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the statement of the reasons for the decision of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

Therefore, among the lawsuits in this case, the claim as to Article 2-2(b) through (d) of the Information on Disclosure Claim listed in the Attached Table 1 is unlawful and dismissed, and the claim as to the Information on Disclosure Claim listed in the Attached Table 2 is accepted as reasonable, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.

Judges

Judges of the presiding judge;

Judges fixed-scale

Category of Judges:

Attached Form

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

arrow