logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.26 2016고정583
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a foreigner with the nationality of “KIKO Switzerland” located in the region north of the Central Asia, who is a representative director of the B corporation located in Yangsan City D, and Defendant A is a director, and Defendant A is a person who engages in used cars export business as an executive director.

No one shall dismantle any motor vehicle, such as motor power generating device, power transmission device, boarding device, loading device, etc., except in cases falling under any ground prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation for the purpose of education and research, such as the inspection and maintenance of the motor vehicle, scrapping of the motor vehicle, use it for educational and research purposes.

Defendant

A and E did not register the automobile dismantling for the purpose of inspection, maintenance, and monitoring, scrapping, education, or research as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the Republic of Korea, or did not report the automobile dismantling business at the time of Gyeongsan-do.

Defendant

On January 7, 2015, A and E, at the workplace of “B Co., Ltd.” located in Yangnam-si, in order to purchase domestic used cars and sell them to foreign countries, such as central Asia, and thereby gain profits therefrom, Defendant A and E have overall control over the business of overseas export and the purchase of used cars, etc., and E, in collusion with the management of automobile dismantling business, such as export declaration and issuance of pages, document work, shocking work, etc., and dismantled 26 without permission, as shown in the attached crime list, by January 11, 2016.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. violated the duty of Defendant A and E as described in the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. Each internal investigation report (the counsel does not dismantle the whole loading system, but aims at facilitating the transportation of exported vehicles.

arrow