logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.03.24 2015나20485
손해배상청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Each of the instant construction works and the Defendant’s status 1) The Plaintiff is a gold industry corporation (hereinafter “gold industry”).

(1) The Korea Electric Power Corporation awarded a subcontract for the construction of conduits for the B-Power Facilities contracted by the Korea Electric Power Corporation from the gold industry, and in addition, the construction of the C-Power Distribution Line and the construction of the D-Power Distribution Line was subcontracted by each contractor (hereinafter “B”), “C”, “D”, and “each of the instant construction works” when performing the said construction works together.

(2) From April 9, 2012 to November 30, 2013, the Defendant was in charge of managing the construction work of each of the instant construction sites while working as the Plaintiff’s field agent for each of the instant construction sites.

B. 1) In the case of C Construction, unlike the original design drawings at the time of the construction work in the section of the king New Power Station at the time of the excavation work, the road package was completed at the time of the completion of the construction in the state of insufficient construction of 2 m (175m x 20m x 1m x 100m x 1m x 1m x 1m). In the case of D Construction, the Plaintiff re-exploded the roads packed on December 4, 2013 and reconstructed the said parts. 2) There was a defect in the construction in which the electrical Manle was installed at the vicinity of the location where the excellent Manle is installed and interference between the two, and the Plaintiff again installed at another location on December 13, 2013, and the Plaintiff did not display the original design drawings to the point of the construction work, and the Defendant did not obtain approval from the Plaintiff on the part of the 10th mal. 10th mal.

3 In the case of B, part.

arrow