beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant (legal name B) is the well-known knowledge of D in Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongbuk-si.
Defendant
On April 19, 2013, E, F, and G applied for a subsidy of KRW 150 million out of the total project cost of KRW 157.5 million as a subsidy to the Gyeonggi-si Saemaul Culture and the Gyeonggi-do Saemaul D, which are located in 159, Nam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, and 159,000,000,000 won of the total project cost of KRW 15,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
Defendant
In addition, E, F, and G conspired as mentioned above, deceiving the victims of the Simsan City, and deceiving them through the bank account in the name of D and the village Saemaul Savings Depository account (J) as a subsidy, around May 22, 2013, after receiving KRW 150 million from the victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement of K;
1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the copies of documents related to the change of the project, such as the contract (Evidence No. 10), copies of documents related to the change of the project (Evidence No. 11), such as the application for the grant of subsidies (Evidence No. 12), copies of documents related to the project (Evidence No. 35), such as written applications and electronic tax invoices (Evidence No. 37), copies of documents related to the project, such as written applications and electronic tax invoices (Evidence No. 37), three copies (Evidence No. 48), one copy (Evidence No. 49), application for the grant of subsidies, project plans, and copies (Evidence No. 52), and copies (Evidence No. 52) of documents related to the contract for the grant of subsidies related to the work of H reconstruction project in D;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Improper receipt of subsidies for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order.