1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From September 1, 1988, the Plaintiff served as professor with the Ui Han University B and the Defendant’s faculty.

B. The Plaintiff was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor as Jeonju District Court 2013 Man-Ma1914, and appealed with Jeonju District Court 2014No376 and reversed the judgment of the first instance court on July 18, 2014 and sentenced a fine of KRW 7,50,000 at the appellate court.

C. On February 17, 2015, the Defendant’s teachers’ disciplinary committee decided to take a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff for three months of suspension from office on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s act committed a false crime in connection with the claim for transfer money with the Defendant, the act of reproductive a dispute with food tools, such as filing a request for reexamination on two occasions without legitimate grounds, despite the fact that the lower judgment against the claim for transfer money became final and conclusive, and the act of asserting that it is unreasonable to apply the law of the judiciary again in the disciplinary procedure, etc. in spite of confession in the court, etc., as well as impairing the dignity of university professors, as well as impairing the honor of friendly Private Teaching Institutes and Mau University”, Article 61(1)3 of the Private School Act, Article 6 subparag. 1 and 4 of the Defendant’s Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee Regulations, Articles 2 and 3 of the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee Regulations, and accordingly, the Defendant was subject to a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on February 24, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). D.

The Plaintiff filed an appeal review with the Appeal Commission against the instant disciplinary action on April 22, 2015.

(e) Where a teacher of a private school falls under any of the following subparagraphs, a person who is authorized to appoint and dismiss the teacher concerned shall request a resolution on disciplinary action and take a disciplinary action according to the result of a resolution on disciplinary action:

3. The dignity of a teacher regardless of whether he is on or off duty.