logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.07.25 2019고단556
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

. Using the E’s seal imprint and the seal imprint, etc. on January 8, 2014, the E’s name and address, and contact numbers are stated in the paper A4 for the purpose of exercising them, and the E’s name, address, and contact numbers are stated, and the E’s name and address are stated and then the E’s name and work for the E’s entertainment business site in Gangnam-gu operated by B from October 1998 to November 30, 206 as the former owner of the E’s entertainment business site. For approximately eight years, the prepaid amount paid to female visitors who are called the “mast” reached approximately 60 million won. At the same time, the E’s seal imprint was written at will by request from a person who is known as the legal team leader working at the office B, and the E’s seal imprint was written at will from 1000 to 1400,000,000 won, and the E’s seal imprint was written at will, and the E’s seal imprint was written at will.

B. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant submitted to the presiding judge of the Seoul Central District Court case No. 2014 Gohap 256, which was unable to know the forged E-name verification document using the electronic litigation system via D at the Seoul Central District Court via D, and exercised it.

C. On November 18, 2013, 2013, H and D filed a lawsuit against H and D with the Seoul Central District Court case No. 2013Gahap83751 on the purport that “H and D shall jointly and severally pay B the total amount of KRW 140,00,000, etc. of the PR expenses and the borrowed amount,” and the Seoul Central District Court on July 25, 2014.

arrow