1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, each point is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

In full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 5 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff, on December 17, 2015, leased the real estate of this case to the defendant during the period from January 4, 2016 to January 3, 2017, with the following facts: (a) KRW 1,00,000,000 for deposit money of KRW 442.06,00 for the ship (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") connected each point in sequence 1,2,3,4, and 1,50,000 for the following month; (b) KRW 4,50,00 for the management expenses, KRW 1,710 for the following month; and (c) from January 4, 2016 to January 3, 2017; and (d) the lessee, after the expiration of the lease period, concluded a lease contract to restore the real estate of this case to its original condition; and (d) the defendant was notified by the defendant on July 1, 27, 17.

According to the above facts, since the instant lease contract was terminated on or around August 4, 2017, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and pay unjust enrichment and management expenses equivalent to 6,60,000 won per month from July 4, 2017 (the Plaintiff was the person who paid rent and management expenses from May 4, 2017, and from June to June) of the instant building until the completion date of delivery of the instant building (i.e., rent of KRW 4,50,000, value added tax of KRW 450,000, value added tax of KRW 1,710,000).

In addition, as seen above, the lessee agreed to restore the instant real estate to its original state after the expiration of the lease term at the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement, and according to the overall purport of the statement and pleading No. 7, it can be recognized that KRW 42,701,100 is required to restore the instant real estate to its original state.