beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence against Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct is the representative director of (ju) E. Defendant A and the person who gives advice to Defendant B on accounting, etc. as an automobile with automobile with an automobile with an intention to sell the goods purchased by Defendant A, and the Defendants, upon purchasing the goods by Defendant B, sold the goods purchased by Defendant A to use them for personal purposes.
On May 21, 2012, the Defendants conspired to purchase a two-party 106 No. 743-6 in the agent of two-party 106 in the name of the above-mentioned No. 743-6, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, to the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd. for the purpose of purchasing the thalthma and the stalthmaH car in the name of the above-mentioned No. 106.
However, in fact, Defendant B had already borrowed KRW 23,00,000 from Hyundai Capital, and KRW 50,000,000 from the SC Japan bank, and KRW 20,000,000 from the Enterprise Bank. Although purchasing a building and land in the Group F in Gyeonggi-si, there was a shortage of KRW 120,000,000 in the purchase price, the said amount was paid KRW 88,00,000 for penalty due to the shortage of KRW 120,00,00, and the said Section E was not enough to file a report on the closure of business on October 2012. Therefore, Defendant B had no intent or ability to repay the loan to the victim, as well as considered that the said vehicle was sold in cash as the immediately after the delivery of the said vehicle and made it impossible for the victim to exercise the mortgage.
The Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above and concluded a loan contract in the name of the victim, namely, (E) in the name of the victim, and received KRW 87,400,00 for the name of the loan.
B. At around July 5, 2012, the Defendants conspired and operated by H, a workplace partner of the Defendant’s workplace in the Yeongdeungpo-gu G in Gyeonggi-gu G, Gyeonggi-do, and the Defendant’s workplace who is aware of the above facts, B, and the victim K with a telephone and a shock.