Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant and the injured party B are pending in divorce proceedings between husband and wife.
Before June 26, 2015, the Defendant openly insulting the victim, such as: (a) prior to the 16:00 on June 26, 2015, the Defendant sought documents related to leave of absence and requested the head of the headquarters to hold a meeting; (b) sought the body room operated by the victim in Bocheon City C; and (c) sought the victim’s clothes in D, which is the principal restaurant operator in the neighboring restaurant, from the place where D, the Defendant “Is for why he or she was unable to obtain his or her qualification as his or her baby (railroad construction); and (d) “Is for the low-age women.”
2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. Since the documents that the victim would revoke the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case were submitted to this court, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.