Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on March 4, 2013, on the ground that the Defendant did not repay the Defendant’s loan to the victim in the Eda located in Jinju-si operated by the Victim C, and (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not repay the Defendant’s loan to the victim, and (c) on the part of the victim, the Defendant openly insultingd the victim from among 5-6 members of Jinju-si (5-6 members of Ginju-si, Doo-gu, Doo-gu, Doo-gu, Doo-gu, Doo-gu, Doo-gu, Ha
2. The charge of this case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. Since the facts charged of this case can be acknowledged as having been revoked by making a statement that the victim does not want to be punished as a witness at the third trial date on November 25, 2013, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted on November 25, 2013, by stating that the victim does not want to be punished, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327