A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Central District Court, and on September 3, 2009, sentenced the Seoul Central District Court to three years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) and completed the execution of the sentence on July 7, 2012.

1. On November 20, 2012, the Defendant took up at around 05:55, the Defendant: (a) a 30,000 won in cash, which is located adjacent to the entrance of the victim C in order to get off from the 4-3 column of the front-speed terminal station car of Seoul subway Line 7, the high-speed terminal station car of Seoul subway Line 7, and the front-speed 4-3 square meters of the front-round 2012; and (b) a 200,000 won in market price which includes one bank and physical card in the victim’s name, one copy of the credit card, and one resident registration certificate, etc.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. On January 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took out one observer cell phone in the amount of KRW 700,000 at the market price in which the victim D was located at the right-hand part of the shopping car in front of the e-mail-based 316-2, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, 316-2, using the gap in organizing the goods purchased by the victim D in the shopping car box in front of this e-mail-gu.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

3. On January 11, 2013, at around 23:30 on January 23:30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in calculating the goods purchased by the victim E at the same place, using the gaps moving to the shopping car; (b) in scar equivalent to the market price of 900,000, scar, which was located on the left part of the coke of the damaged person’s scar; (c) in scar

In other words, even though they attempted to steal, they had attempted to do so with the wind that is detected by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals the victims' property three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and E;

1. Evidence photographs of the principal of the crime, a photograph of the victim, and of each screen picture taken;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A inquiry letter, such as criminal history, results of search by prisoners, investigation reports (verification of criminal history), and written judgments;

1. Habituality in the holding: Each judgment.