A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to pay taxi expenses and to verify personal information by police officers E belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station C district unit in the Mapo-gu Police Station C district and F, called “G news, spaws,” who were called “G news, spaws,” and sent out, at the C district parking lot located in Yongsan-gu, Changwon-si; (b) around 03:0 on August 25, 2019, the Defendant: (c) threatened the said F, who controlled said act, with the desire of “g news, spaws, bits, bits, bits, bits, bits,” thereby threatening the F to take the face of F in his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

2. At the time and place of the insult, the Defendant publicly insulting the victims by referring the victim E and F, a police officer, to “cins, gins, flus, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium,” while complying with D, a taxi engineer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. 112 reported case management table and chief complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (CCTV fix photographs and video attachment);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment in 2017 due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and was sentenced to a fine in 2018, resulting in the instant crime even though the same criminal records were four times.

It seems that the damaged police officers were flick at a considerable level of maternity.

However, the defendant recognizes and reflects the facts of crime.

In addition, the sentencing guidelines shall be punished by imprisonment.