The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the victim C (the son, the 40-year-old age-old)’s residence, which was divorced on the two-story B and B of Gyeonggi-gun; and (b) committed assault to the victim (the son, the son, who was divingd from his her female under the influence of alcohol, for the purpose of viewing his/her children; (c) the son, who was divingd from his/her female under the influence of alcohol, shoulders the Defendant; and (d) the son’s face from his/her home; and (d) the son was able to walk on one occasion by his/her hand; and (d) the son was able to walk the son’s face on his/her bridge.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On January 2, 2017, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.